Posts
UPSC GS 3 PRACTICS MAINS QUESTION .......................................................
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
upsc mains question.......................................
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
ENGLISH LITERATURE (OPTIONAL) FOR UPSC:.......................................................................
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
UPSC (OPTIONAL ENGLISH LITERATRE) ENGLISH The syllabus consists of two papers, designed to test a first-hand and critical reading of texts prescribed from the following periods in English Literature : Paper 1 : 1600-1900 and Paper 2 : 1900–1990. There will be two compulsory questions in each paper : (a) A short-notes question related to the topics for general study, and (b) A critical analysis of UNSEEN passages both in prose and verse. PAPER I (Answers must be written in English) Texts fordetailed study are listed below. Candidates will alsobe required toshowadequate knowledge of the following topics and movements : The Renaissance; Elizabethan and Jacobean Drama; Metaphysical Poetry; The Epic and the Mock-epic; Neo-classicism; Satire; The Romantic Moveme...
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Q:- IN INDIA , THE FIRST MUNICIPAL CORPORATION WAS SET UP IN WHICH CITY ?? ANSWER:- IN INDIA THE FIRST MUNICIPAL CORPORATION WAS SET-UP IN CHENNAI ,THE CAPITAL OF TAMIL NADU. "LORD MAYO'S RESOLUTION OF 1870" ON FINANCIAL DECENTRALISATION VISUALISED THE DEVELOPMENT OF "LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT" INSTITUTIONS. "LORD RIPON'S RESOLUTION OF 1882" HAS BEEN HAILED AS THE "MAGNA CARTA" OF LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT.HE IS CALLED THE FATHER OF THE LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Q:- WHAT IS THE POSITION OF THE RIGHT TO PROPERTY IN INDIA? ANSWER:- LEGAL RIGHT AVAILABLE TO ANY PERSON. EXP- RIGHT TO PROPERTY IN INDIA IS A CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL RIGHT AVAILABLE TO ALL PERSONS.THE RIGHT TO PROPERTY CEASED TO BE A "FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT" BY THE CONSTITUTION (44TH AMENDMENT ) ACT 1978. ARTICLE 300 OF THE CONSTITUTION PROVIDES THAT NO PERSON SHALL BE DEPRIVED OF HIS PROPERTY EXCEPT ON PROHIBITION FROM AUTHORITY OF LAW, THE STATE CAN NOT DISPOSSESS A CITIZEN OF HIS PROPERTY EXCEPT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURE ESTABLISHED OF LAW. IN WOTHER WORDS, TO FORCIBLY DISPOSSESS A PERSON OF HIS PRIVATE PROPERTY, WITHOUT FOLLOWING DUE PROCESS OF LAW, WOULD BE VIOLATIVE OF A HUMAN RIGHT, AS ALSO THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT UNDER ARTICLE 300 (A) OF THE CONSTITUTION.